Common Sense "Karma" - Good most often begets Good (Non Religious Post)

Today's post is using common sense to explain the theory of Karma and basically why a person should do good actions with good moral reasons more often than not.

Till next word...

My Name is Earl trailer - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyAKsyDN_04

My YouTube Page for this video : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-XjjrnRls0

Captain Hindsight!! : The personal Ego hero of many

Today's post is on the topic of people using hindsight to justify bad and illogical decisions and a solution of Stoicism to overcome the 'Captain Hindsight Syndrome' that many display. ( *NOTE: The South Park episode is season 14 not 15)

Till next word...

South Park Episode 11 Season 14 : Hindsight from the official South Park Website :  http://www.southparkstudios.com/full-episodes/s14e11-coon-2-hindsight

An essay on the basics of Stoicism :  http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/stoicism/

A Documentary on how to apply the stoic way of life to achieve more happiness : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UA7cgIg4Lfs

Part 1 of 5 (side bar links in the page to parts 2-5) a lecture on Emperor Marcus Aurelius and his stoic masterpiece 'Meditations' : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLD09Qa3kMk

My YouTube Page for this video : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-XjjrnRls0

'Life' Vs Happiness/Poker : A choice?

Today's post is to discuss with the focus example of 'Jobs' whether between the realities of social stigma and everyday life versus happiness. Which one should one choose and why.

Till next word...

*A article from 2007 detailing from places like the Center for work life policy on how people at the top can work up to 70hrs a week and how most describe 16 out of 45hrs a week working as 'unproductive'.

*A personal post by someone who works 45-55hrs a week on how much of his life is spent working.

*A simple calculation on simple 8hrs a day working calender for a lifetime.

Agnosticism: A Logical "Religion"

The Simplicity of Logic's author has seen that by avoiding technology is a illogical step and thus has stepped into the Vlog realm. Posts from now on will be mostly video and will be posted here and on one's personal YouTube page.

As a first Vlog post on this discussion Blog, today's topic will be about one's view on what one considers the most fair and logical 'Religion', if you can even call it that. That belief is termed Agnosticism and one does hope, there is some good this Vlog will do to someone out there. 

Till next word...

 Free Hugs : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-QaH1FUI1gU

Aryan Brotherhood : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fh8mhmf-l_E

Richard Dawnkins Vs Ted Haggard : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmMv0ceWTVQ
(Ted Haggard was later proved to have sexual relations with other men and is now not a pastor as of the date of this video.)

"Sorry" in Poker : A focus example on insincere cultural practices

Tradition and culture are important lessons from the past that in general allows one to improve one's life through tried and tested methods of those that came before. The author grants that point of view but it is when these traditions and practices are followed blindly and not logically for social acceptance that the author starts to show outward disapproval of such traditions. The best summary of today's post is in this link from the movie on Confucius's life (start at minute 3:43)*. The linked clip on the issue of ritual sacrificial burials.

The same lesson gleamed from the link above can be readily applied to today's focus example of saying 'Sorry' after winning a hand (usually in a mathematically underdog position) in Poker but first, two main points of defense from the point of view of those who do say 'Sorry' and it's direct rebuttals:

Truly feeling sorry in getting lucky in the hand of Poker:  There is no doubt that one of normal character would feel embarrassed by getting lucky and winning the hand but if said person was asked if they wanted to get lucky to win. The answer in most cases would still be a resounding 'Yes'. Thus the act itself is insincere and defeats the meaning of the act of being sorry. I liken this same insincerity to a murderer lying in a court trial saying he is sorry for killing the victim. In this case, the murderer actually having more of a reason to lie as if he is able to pull the lie off, he gets a lighter sentence. While the 'Sorry' poker player usually getting nothing but a insincere smile back from the person one just got lucky on due to the fact that he knows of the insincerity in the 'Sorry' said too.

Wanting to avoid offending the other party by saying 'Sorry': This reason being trouble in itself due to the fact that if the person that has been beat is the type that is unreasonable and gets angry, then he would, regardless of whether one says sorry of not. In fact, in saying sorry, one might take spark offence. As in Poker everyone wants to win and thus unless one is willing to return the money won in the pot, saying sorry and raking in the winning chips/money is not only insincere but in doing so, might imply insult to the point that the person's intelligence can't recognize insincerity when it is shown.

Thus, in explaining the above, it would be lacking if one does not give a solution to the above problem. The Problem being having gotten lucky and then what to do. The best solution the author practices being doing nothing. Just accept you have won and collect the chips in silence, allowing the moment of tension to pass by and avoid saying anything to offend. A second solution if one is inclined, offering something to the other party, if not a little money back, then maybe helping him get a drink or such. The act itself showing no hard feelings and breaks the moment of tension too but in general, one still thinks the best act is just to let the moment pass quietly. 

In conclusion, all acts of tradition or even certain religious practices have their reasons on inception but the continuation of such practices have to be constantly reviewed logically and if outdated or a better practice having been discovered, abandon said traditional practice. As one would feel it would not only be illogcal but a injustice to a thinking species to avoid a good solution over the reasoning of : "It has always been this way." 

Till Next word...

*In case, the link above gets taken down. The clip is as follows. General Gong is arguing with Confucius that a runaway slave should be buried alive with his dead master due to the traditions of the time. The reason being the master needing the slave for his afterlife. This being said, Confucius states that if that is so, then General Gong should be buried alive with the slave too as there were many cases before the master's death of him saying he could not live without General Gong too.